Jamie Spencer
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has unveiled its latest proposed remedies in its case against Google, making significant adjustments under the Trump administration. While Google will not be forced to sell off its artificial intelligence (AI) investments or Android, the DOJ remains firm in its demand that the company divest from its Chrome browser.
Google’s Chrome Browser at Risk
The DOJ argues that Google’s control over search and its dominance in the browser market give it an unfair advantage, ensuring it always wins in the digital marketplace. As a result, the DOJ is asking the court to mandate that Google promptly sell Chrome and its associated assets. The proposed sale would be subject to national security reviews, and Google would be barred from releasing a new browser during the duration of the judgment.
However, the DOJ does not seek to block Google from contributing to Chromium, the open-source foundation of Chrome, allowing the company to continue its work in browser development in a limited capacity.
Government Eases Stance on AI and Android
While previous DOJ filings under the Biden administration considered forcing Google to divest from AI investments, this is no longer on the table. Instead, Google will need to notify the government before making any future AI acquisitions or investments. This decision follows arguments from Google that restrictions on AI investment could harm U.S. leadership in the sector.
Similarly, the DOJ has removed the option for Google to sell Android as an alternative remedy. Instead, new restrictions will be imposed on how Google integrates its search and AI services within Android. Specifically, Google would be barred from making its search engine or generative AI tools mandatory on Android devices, and it cannot pressure partners into prioritizing its search services over competitors.
Google’s Response and Legal Strategy
Google remains opposed to the DOJ’s proposed remedies, calling them excessive and harmful to consumers, businesses, and national security. “DOJ’s sweeping proposals continue to go miles beyond the Court’s decision and would harm America’s consumers, economy, and national security,” a Google spokesperson said.
The company has not altered its previously suggested remedies, which focus on revising its search placement deals and accepting regulatory oversight instead of divestitures. Google is expected to appeal the court’s final ruling and seek delays in implementing the remedies, mirroring its approach in the Epic Games Play Store trial.
What Comes Next?
The case, currently under the leadership of acting DOJ Antitrust Division head Omeed Assefi, is expected to move into the next legal phase in the coming weeks. If Senate-confirmed nominee Gail Slater takes charge, further scrutiny of Google’s business practices may follow. The final ruling will determine how the DOJ proceeds with its breakup plans and regulatory restrictions.
Despite the DOJ easing its stance on AI and Android, Google still faces a significant battle over Chrome and its search business. The coming months will reveal whether the tech giant can successfully navigate these regulatory challenges or if it will be forced to restructure its operations.
